Some of you may have found, especially over the internet, in places of particular depravity, a new breed of homosexual: the asexual homosexual. These homos will do their best to convince you that there is nothing necessarily sexual about homosexuality, which merely revolves around "love" of people of the same sex, so there is nothing preventing them from having an asexual relationship with their partners, that is, they just asexually hold hands, asexually french-kiss each other, and asexually fantasize about being alone at night. And not only that, but they will act offended if you describe the filth that are homosexual acts, as if you were a filthy pervert for even thinking that homosexuals do what defines them.
This eloquent argument, that homosexual relationships do not need to be sexual, is a good way to make gullible fools disconnect homosexuals from their filth. This argument is waved around by all kind of homo apologists, not only homosexuals themselves. One would expect that such angels, who do not care about sex at all, would be living examples of innocence. However, an examination of their lives usually results in discovering an endless consumption of pornography filled with the most deranged fetishes. The asexual homosexual is, more often than not, a furry, a victim of rape, a frequent client of the nearest gay bar, a rabid atheist liberal, and other similar conditions that involve disorder.
But what is, then, the weak point of this apology? The key of the matter is the following: all relations where the sex of people involved restrict the relationship are intrinsically tied to sexuality. Relations with no sexuality involved are friendship or family relationships. And what justifies the sexuality in them and the importance given to someone's sex in these relationship? The desire to have children and create a family. This is what romantic love revolves around, and is therefore intrinsically sexual. That is why the "asexual" homosexual relationships purely mimick elements from sexual heterosexual relationships. They are pretty much a sexual relationship with delayed sex, but with all the eroticism, pornography, and vulgarity cranked up to eleven.
Sure, at times we desire friends of the same or different sex in one context or the other, but such relationships are clearly identified as friendship, and is never totally exclusive to some sex. The non-homosexual (that is, the normal person) seems to have no equivalent of these asexual, sex-restricted, non-friendship relationships that homosexuals constantly mention. The asexual homosexual is always reluctant to explain in clear terms what makes their asexual homosexual relationships different from everyday friendship, which is many times shared across people who even live together or have really strong ties similar to those of direct family. The reason is that such difference is the presence of constant homoeroticism. The asexual relationship is just a perverted fantasy, a kind of fetishistic build up in which the (usually) older homosexual slowly grooms the younger one and turns him into a pet.
The explanation that the homosexual will ultimately give will be something in the lines of "I connected with X like no-one else", or "X understands me perfectly". Strange descriptions, since anyone with a healthy social life can probably say that about one or several friends without considering them lovers. They are, rather, a reflection of the aforementioned grooming process. The younger, weaker homosexual usually has a dysfunctional background, filled with abuse, lack of good family relationships or friendships. This person, starving for affection, who does not know what love is, who repudiates family and has no real friends, is the perfect prey for the older homosexual, who will offer, with an endless stream of honeyed words, his sweet love. A tainted mockery of love, poisoned false affection, similar to the sweets that pedophiles offer to children before raping them, or to the just as sweet words of an abuser who needs the victim to think too much about what is truly being done.
This brings us to the title of this article: all of this is possible because homosexuals do not know what love is. In their minds, they are "just like heterosexuals". For the young one, holding hands and kissing in the lips is totally asexual, even if he just happens to watch pornography together with his boyfriend, because he doesnt know what love is. The older one knows he seeks sex, but since he doesn't know what love is either, he thinks nobody will notice, just like his victim initially falls for the excuses.
And just like sexual relationships are labelled as asexual because of their lack of understanding of romantic love (namely how it is ordered towards the family), the opposite happens, and asexual relationships are labelled as sexual because of their lack of understanding of friendship. Their ideal of friendship is completely superficial, so anything above such superficiality must be romantic love, and therefore homosexual. It comes as no surprise that it is more and more frequent to see liberals declaring characters from old writings to be homosexuals because the fact that they show any kind of deep bond surely proves that they are homosexuals. Not even the Bible is free from this injection of AIDs into everything, with entire books being written about fictional sexual innuendos. So rotten is their mind, so filled with porn is their brain, that they see homosexuality everywhere, but we are supposed to believe that sexuality is nowhere.
Overall, the asexual homosexual is an initiate who is just halfway out of the closet. A condition that is made possible by a life filled with the vulgar sex and sexuality that they try so hard to deny. It is an invitation to the gay bar under the excuse that "food is cheap". Nobody buys the lie, not even those who try to use it to lie to themselves.